Skip to content
RockPointCyber
← All pipelines

Compose a pipeline

Pick the domains you are responsible for. Every control the graph holds for them is placed into the lifecycle phase where it belongs, with the frameworks it evidences and the attacks it stops.

Domains

Maturity ceiling

Controls carry the maturity level a program needs to run them. Raising the ceiling adds depth and volume; level 3 is a realistic target for most teams.

2 controls1 of 8 lifecycle phases · level 1 and below
OPSRun
Runtime and platform at Plan: nothing, by the nature of the work
Runtime and platform at Code: nothing, by the nature of the work
Runtime and platform at Test: nothing, by the nature of the work
Runtime and platform at Release: nothing, by the nature of the work
Attacks
none modeled
3 open
none modeled
none modeled
none modeled
none modeled
none modeled
none modeled
GOV Governance and assurance
The stream that decides what blocks, and proves it blocked.
SUP Open source and third-party supply
Everything you did not write, arriving faster than you can review it.
DEV Design and development
Where the cost of a fix is lowest and the attention is shortest.
DEL Build and delivery
The machine that makes the thing, and the largest single target in the chain.
VER Testing and validation
The stream that finds out whether any of the others worked.
OPS Runtime and platform
The last place to stop something, and the most expensive.
OBS Detection and continuous observation
The only stream whose answer changes while nothing else does.

The figure is how many controls the field places in that cell and the wash behind it is how much of the cell you have decided — 2 targeted, 0 ignored, 331 still open, of 333. A ring means the cell is closed. Your 2 controls account for 2 of those, because a control that belongs at build and again at deploy is two decisions about where it runs rather than one. Ignoring a control counts as decided and leaves the denominator, so coverage measures what you said you would do rather than everything that exists.

The dashed rules are the two boundaries every pipeline has, whatever its platform: intake at build and release at release. Both default open — nothing is refused unless something was configured to refuse it.

The columns are drawn as a row here and as a loop elsewhere, and the same eight phases are the eight color groups a player walks around the DevSecOpoly board, in these same colors. The shape is a convenience. What is real is that each phase is a set of activities, and an activity is only worth doing because it enables a capability.

Framework coverage

What this selection alone would let you evidence.

  • CI/CD Top 10

    2 of 10

    OWASP Top 10 CI/CD Security Risks

    CICD-SEC-1 · CICD-SEC-2

  • SLSA 1.2

    2 of 16

    Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA) 1.2

    Source L2 — Continuous immutable history · Source L3 — Enforced technical controls

  • SSDF 1.1

    1 of 42

    NIST Secure Software Development Framework 1.1 (SP 800-218)

    PS.1.1

  • Scorecard

    1 of 20

    OpenSSF Scorecard Checks

    Branch-Protection

Coverage by phase

  • Code

    1 countered · 3 open of 4

What this selection leaves open

  • Unauthorized Commit Injection

    Countered2 real incidents

    Common · Code

    Countered by Branch Protection & Ruleset Enforcement.

  • Malicious IDE Extension

    Open

    Emerging · Code

    Nothing in this pipeline counters it. The graph knows 1 capability that would: Developer Workstation Hardening.

  • Slopsquatting (Hallucinated Package Squatting)

    Open

    Emerging · Code

    Nothing in this pipeline counters it. The graph knows 3 capabilities that would: AI Coding Assistant Security Guardrails, AI-Generated Code Vulnerability Detection, Hallucinated Package Detection.

  • Typosquatting and Brandjacking

    Open

    Very Common · Code

    Nothing in this pipeline counters it. The graph knows 3 capabilities that would: Dependency Curation & Allowlisting, Namespace & Package Name Reservation, Typosquatting Detection.

Not in this comparison

Does not apply to this kind of pipeline
stages A composed pipeline has no authored stages; its capabilities are grouped by lifecycle phase.
gaps Gap analysis compares a stage's capabilities against the products that stage uses, and only a client pipeline records products in use. A composed pipeline models the design, not an estate.

How this was produced

Every figure above was read from the Gantry knowledge graph, version 7.1.0, and computed when you opened this page — in 695 ms on 2026-10-27. Nothing here is a cached verdict or a dataset assembled for marketing: it is the same model our engagements run on.