AI Model & Agent Security

Now pick what to compare Mindgard against.

Mindgard clear

Open a name for its full profile

Prisma AIRS
Capabilities only
Palo Alto Networks · Commercial · 6 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
HiddenLayer AISec Platform
Capabilities only
HiddenLayer · Commercial · 5 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Cisco AI Defense
Capabilities only
Cisco · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Noma Security
Capabilities only
Noma Security · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Amazon Bedrock Guardrails
Capabilities only
Amazon Web Services · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Azure AI Content Safety
Capabilities only
Microsoft · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Lakera Guard
Capabilities only
Lakera · Freemium · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
promptfoo
Capabilities only
Promptfoo · Open Source · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
LlamaFirewall
Capabilities only
Meta · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
MCP-Scan
Capabilities only
Snyk · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Mindgard
Capabilities only
Mindgard · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
selected
NeMo Guardrails
Capabilities only
NVIDIA · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
PyRIT
Capabilities only
Microsoft Security Engineering · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
garak
Capabilities only
NVIDIA · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ModelScan
Capabilities only
Protect AI · Open Source · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
OpenSSF Model Signing
Capabilities only
Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) · Open Source · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →

In AI Model & Agent Security

garak

NVIDIA · AI Model & Agent Security

Close ×

Open SourceCompany

garak runs probe and detector plugins against model endpoints and reports failure rates.

Repository ↗

What it does2 capabilities · 1 at full coverage

1 of 2 at full coverage.

AI Red Teaming & Model EvaluationPartialAI · level 4 · 9 providers
LLM Application Security TestingFullAI · level 3 · 4 providers

What it proves8 controls across 4 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

LLM Top 104 / 10LLM01:2025 LLM04:2025 LLM05:2025 LLM06:2025
AI RMF2 / 19MANAGE 1 MEASURE 2
AICM1 / 18TVM
Agentic Top 101 / 10ASI01

What it stops5 techniques · 1 risk

5 techniques countered, 4 of them common

LLM JailbreakAML.T0054Very Common
LLM Prompt InjectionAML.T0051Very Common
Craft Adversarial DataAML.T0043Common
Extract LLM System PromptAML.T0056Common
Poison Training DataAML.T0020Emerging

1 risks reduced

AI application or agent manipulated into harmful action or data leakageHigh

Where it runs1 phase · 1 way to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Test2

How it is delivered

CLI tool

What it unlocks2 activities · reaches level 5

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 5. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 3

Test AI applications and detect prompt injectionMedium effort

Level 5

Continuous AI red teaming and data integrity assuranceHigh effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsOpen source (free) · free tier

LicensingOpen source (free)

Priced pernone

BillingFree

Scales withOperating effort only

Total cost

No license cost, but self-support, upgrades, scaling and integration effort must be budgeted as personnel cost.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with

No supported language, standard, integration or named feature recorded.

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13