Exposure & Vulnerability Management

Now pick what to compare OX Security against.

OX Security clear

Open a name for its full profile

Cycode
Scored
Cycode · Commercial · 8 capabilities in this domain · 4.07 / 5
Compare →
Apiiro
Scored
Apiiro · Commercial · 7 capabilities in this domain · 3.97 / 5
Compare →
ArmorCode
Capabilities only
ArmorCode · Commercial · 5 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Brinqa
Capabilities only
Brinqa · Commercial · 5 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Nucleus Security
Capabilities only
Nucleus Security · Commercial · 5 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Seemplicity
Capabilities only
Seemplicity · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Snyk AppRisk
Capabilities only
Snyk · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
DefectDojo
Capabilities only
OWASP Foundation · Open Source · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Jit
Capabilities only
Jit · Freemium · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Qualys VMDR
Capabilities only
Qualys · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Rapid7 InsightVM
Capabilities only
Rapid7 · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Capabilities only
Tenable · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
OX Security
Capabilities only
OX Security · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
selected
Aikido Security
Capabilities only
Aikido Security · Freemium · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Echo Frontier
Capabilities only
Echo · Commercial · 0 capabilities in this domain
Compare →

In Exposure & Vulnerability Management

DefectDojo

OWASP Foundation · Exposure & Vulnerability Management

Close ×

Open SourceFoundation

DefectDojo imports and deduplicates findings, tracks engagements and SLAs, and pushes issues to Jira.

Repository ↗

What it does4 capabilities · 3 at full coverage

3 of 4 at full coverage, 1 that nothing else provides.

Automated Ticketing & Remediation WorkflowFullEVM · level 2 · 8 providers
Vulnerability Aggregation & DeduplicationFullEVM · level 2 · 11 providers
Vulnerability SLA TrackingFullEVM · level 2 · 6 providers
Security Metrics & ROI ReportingPartialGRC · level 3 · only provider

What it proves14 controls across 6 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

SAMM 2.05 / 90G-SM-2-B G-SM-3-B I-DM-1-A I-DM-2-A I-DM-2-B
SSDF 1.13 / 42PO.4.1 RV.2.1 RV.2.2
CSF 2.02 / 106GV.OV-03 GV.RR-03
DSOMM2 / 19IG-Test-KPI TV-Consolidation
AI RMF1 / 19MEASURE 1
CIS Controls1 / 18CIS 7

What it stops1 risk

1 risks reduced

Critical exposures lost in an unprioritized finding backlogHigh

Where it runs1 phase · 2 ways to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Monitor4

How it is delivered

SaaSSelf-hosted

What it unlocks5 activities · reaches level 5

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 5. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 1

Track findings with severity SLAsLow effort

Level 2

Aggregate findings and route to ownersMedium effort

Level 4

Report riskMedium effort

Level 5

Adapt policy from telemetryHigh effort
Measure exposure reduction and eliminate root causesHigh effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsOpen core or freemium · free tier

LicensingOpen core or freemium

Priced perfree tier plus paid tiers

BillingSubscription

Scales withFeature tier, users or usage beyond the free tier

Total cost

Start free; enterprise needs such as SSO, audit logs and policy often require the paid tier.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with

No supported language, standard, integration or named feature recorded.

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13