Exposure & Vulnerability Management

Now pick what to compare DefectDojo against.

DefectDojo clear

Open a name for its full profile

Cycode
Scored
Cycode · Commercial · 8 capabilities in this domain · 4.07 / 5
Compare →
Apiiro
Scored
Apiiro · Commercial · 7 capabilities in this domain · 3.97 / 5
Compare →
ArmorCode
Capabilities only
ArmorCode · Commercial · 5 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Brinqa
Capabilities only
Brinqa · Commercial · 5 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Nucleus Security
Capabilities only
Nucleus Security · Commercial · 5 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Seemplicity
Capabilities only
Seemplicity · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Snyk AppRisk
Capabilities only
Snyk · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
DefectDojo
Capabilities only
OWASP Foundation · Open Source · 3 capabilities in this domain
selected
Jit
Capabilities only
Jit · Freemium · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Qualys VMDR
Capabilities only
Qualys · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Rapid7 InsightVM
Capabilities only
Rapid7 · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Capabilities only
Tenable · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
OX Security
Capabilities only
OX Security · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Aikido Security
Capabilities only
Aikido Security · Freemium · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Echo Frontier
Capabilities only
Echo · Commercial · 0 capabilities in this domain
Compare →

In Exposure & Vulnerability Management

Rapid7 InsightVM

Rapid7 · Exposure & Vulnerability Management

Close ×

CommercialCompany

InsightVM scores vulnerabilities with threat context and tracks remediation projects with owners.

What it does3 capabilities · 2 at full coverage

2 of 3 at full coverage.

Asset Discovery & Inventory★FullEVM · level 1 · 7 providers
Risk-Based Vulnerability PrioritizationFullEVM · level 3 · 11 providers
Vulnerability SLA TrackingPartialEVM · level 2 · 6 providers

What it proves14 controls across 7 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

CSF 2.05 / 106ID.AM-01 ID.AM-02 ID.RA-04 ID.RA-05 ID.RA-06
CIS Controls3 / 18CIS 1 CIS 2 CIS 7
SSDF 1.12 / 42PO.4.1 RV.2.1
CNAS Top 101 / 10CNAS-8
CRA1 / 41Annex I Part II (2)
DSOMM1 / 19IG-Test-KPI
SAMM 2.01 / 90I-DM-2-B

What it stops1 technique · 2 risks

1 techniques countered, 1 of them common

Exploitation of Known Vulnerable ComponentVery Common

2 risks reduced

Critical exposures lost in an unprioritized finding backlogHigh
Known vulnerability in a reachable dependency is exploitedHigh

Where it runs2 phases · 3 ways to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Operate1
Monitor2

How it is delivered

Host agent or sensorSaaSSelf-hosted

What it unlocks3 activities · reaches level 3

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 3. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 1

Track findings with severity SLAsLow effort

Level 2

Aggregate findings and route to ownersMedium effort

Level 3

Prioritize by exploitabilityMedium effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsPer asset

LicensingPer asset

Priced perasset per year

BillingSubscription

Scales withDiscovered or scanned assets (IPs, hosts, domains)

Total cost

Asset discovery can increase counts unexpectedly; agree on counting rules.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with

No supported language, standard, integration or named feature recorded.

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13