Governance, Risk & Compliance

Now pick what to compare Open Policy Agent against.

Open Policy Agent clear

Open a name for its full profile

Drata
Capabilities only
Drata · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Capabilities only
ServiceNow · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Vanta
Capabilities only
Vanta · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
AuditBoard
Capabilities only
AuditBoard · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Secureframe
Capabilities only
Secureframe · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Chainloop
Capabilities only
Chainloop · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Compliance Trestle (OSCAL Compass)
Capabilities only
Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Open Policy Agent
Capabilities only
Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) · Open Source · 1 capabilities in this domain
selected

In Governance, Risk & Compliance

Chainloop

Chainloop · Governance, Risk & Compliance

Close ×

Open SourceCompany

Chainloop contracts define which evidence each workflow must produce; the control plane stores signed in-toto attestations and reports compliance per product and framework.

Repository ↗

What it does3 capabilities · 2 at full coverage

2 of 3 at full coverage.

Attestation Policy EvaluationFullBUILD · level 4 · 6 providers
Automated Evidence CollectionFullGRC · level 3 · 8 providers
Continuous Compliance MonitoringPartialGRC · level 3 · 9 providers

What it proves13 controls across 7 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

CSF 2.03 / 106GV.OV-03 ID.IM-01 RS.AN-07
SSDF 1.13 / 42PO.3.3 PO.4.2 PS.3.1
SLSA 1.22 / 16Build L2 — Consumer validates provenance Verification — Verification Summary Attestation
SP 800-204D2 / 11204D-CD-VERIFY 204D-CI-EVIDENCE
AICM1 / 18A&A
CIS Controls1 / 18CIS 4
SAMM 2.01 / 90G-PC-3-B

What it stops2 techniques · 1 risk

2 techniques countered, 0 of them common

SLSA threat D: Build from modified source or parametersSLSA-D
SLSA threat F: Upload of a modified artifactSLSA-F

1 risks reduced

Control failures and framework non-compliance go unnoticedMedium

Where it runs5 phases · 2 ways to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Build1
Release2
Deploy1
Operate2
Monitor1

How it is delivered

SaaSSelf-hosted

What it unlocks3 activities · reaches level 5

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 5. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 4

Continuous compliance with automated evidenceMedium effort
Verify provenance and attestations before promotionMedium effort

Level 5

Full chain of custody for every artifactHigh effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsOpen core or freemium · free tier

LicensingOpen core or freemium

Priced perfree tier plus paid tiers

BillingSubscription

Scales withFeature tier, users or usage beyond the free tier

Total cost

Start free; enterprise needs such as SSO, audit logs and policy often require the paid tier.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with3 standards

Standards and formats

CycloneDX (ECMA-424)SPDX (ISO/IEC 5962)in-toto Attestation Framework

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13