Governance, Risk & Compliance

Now pick what to compare Drata against.

Drata clear

Open a name for its full profile

Drata
Capabilities only
Drata · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
selected
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Capabilities only
ServiceNow · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Vanta
Capabilities only
Vanta · Commercial · 4 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
AuditBoard
Capabilities only
AuditBoard · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Secureframe
Capabilities only
Secureframe · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Chainloop
Capabilities only
Chainloop · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Compliance Trestle (OSCAL Compass)
Capabilities only
Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Open Policy Agent
Capabilities only
Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) · Open Source · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →

In Governance, Risk & Compliance

Vanta

Vanta · Governance, Risk & Compliance

Close ×

CommercialCompany

Vanta connects to cloud, identity, HR and code platforms to test controls continuously, collect evidence and manage policies, vendor reviews and trust centers.

What it does5 capabilities · 3 at full coverage

3 of 5 at full coverage.

Automated Evidence CollectionFullGRC · level 3 · 8 providers
Compliance Mapping & Control CrosswalkFullGRC · level 2 · 7 providers
Continuous Compliance MonitoringFullGRC · level 3 · 9 providers
Security Policy Management★PartialGRC · level 1 · 2 providers
Third-Party Vendor Security Assessment★PartialVENDOR · level 1 · 9 providers

What it proves30 controls across 8 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

CSF 2.09 / 106GV.OC-03 GV.OV-03 GV.PO-01 GV.PO-02 GV.SC-04 GV.SC-06 ID.IM-01 ID.RA-10 RS.AN-07
SAMM 2.06 / 90D-SR-1-B D-SR-2-B G-PC-1-A G-PC-1-B G-PC-2-B G-PC-3-B
SSDF 1.15 / 42PO.1.1 PO.1.2 PO.3.3 PO.4.2 PS.3.1
AICM3 / 18A&A GRC STA
CIS Controls3 / 18CIS 15 CIS 16 CIS 4
AI RMF2 / 19GOVERN 1 GOVERN 6
CRA1 / 41Annex I Part I (1)
SP 800-204D1 / 11204D-CI-EVIDENCE

What it stops2 techniques · 2 risks

2 techniques countered, 2 of them common

Trusted RelationshipT1199Common
Trusted Supplier CompromiseCommon

2 risks reduced

Compromise introduced through a software supplier or integrationCritical
Control failures and framework non-compliance go unnoticedMedium

Where it runs5 phases · 1 way to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Plan3
Build1
Release1
Operate2
Monitor1

How it is delivered

SaaS

What it unlocks4 activities · reaches level 4

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 4. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 1

Inventory and assess critical suppliersMedium effort
Publish a secure development and open-source policyLow effort

Level 2

Map obligations to controls and capabilitiesMedium effort

Level 4

Continuous compliance with automated evidenceMedium effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsPlatform enterprise agreement

LicensingPlatform enterprise agreement

Priced perannual contract

BillingSubscription

Scales withNegotiated scope (developers, assets, modules)

Total cost

Opaque list pricing; benchmark with peers and require clear overage terms.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with

No supported language, standard, integration or named feature recorded.

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13