Source Control Security

Now pick what to compare GitHub Enterprise Cloud against.

GitHub Enterprise Cloud clear

Open a name for its full profile

GitHub Enterprise Cloud
Capabilities only
GitHub · Commercial · 7 capabilities in this domain
selected
Bitbucket Cloud
Capabilities only
Atlassian · Freemium · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Allstar
Capabilities only
Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) · Open Source · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Arnica
Capabilities only
Arnica · Freemium · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Azure DevOps Services
Capabilities only
Microsoft · Freemium · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Chain-bench
Capabilities only
Aqua Security · Open Source · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Gitsign
Capabilities only
Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) · Open Source · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Legitify
Capabilities only
Legit Security · Open Source · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →

In Source Control Security

Arnica

Arnica · Source Control Security

Close ×

FreemiumCompany

Arnica analyzes developer behavior to recommend least-privilege repository permissions and flags anomalous code activity without pipeline integration.

What it does4 capabilities · 2 at full coverage

2 of 4 at full coverage, 1 that nothing else provides.

Software Composition Analysis★PartialDEPS · level 1 · 23 providers
Secrets Detection in Source Code★FullSECRETS · level 1 · 15 providers
Repository Access GovernanceFullSCM · level 2 · 3 providers
Unauthorized Code Change DetectionPartialSCM · level 4 · only provider

What it proves30 controls across 14 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

CI/CD Top 104 / 10CICD-SEC-1 CICD-SEC-2 CICD-SEC-6 CICD-SEC-8
CSF 2.04 / 106GV.SC-07 ID.RA-01 PR.AA-01 PR.AA-05
SSDF 1.14 / 42PS.1.1 PW.4.4 PW.7.2 RV.1.1
CIS Controls3 / 18CIS 16 CIS 6 CIS 7
ASVS 5.02 / 17V13 V15
CNAS Top 102 / 10CNAS-5 CNAS-7
S2C2F2 / 25SCA-1 SCA-2
SAMM 2.02 / 90I-SB-2-B I-SD-2-B
Scorecard2 / 20Vulnerabilities Webhooks
CRA1 / 41Annex I Part I (2)(a)
DSOMM1 / 19TV-Static-Depth-Applications
OWASP Top 101 / 10A03:2025
SLSA 1.21 / 16Source L3 — Enforced technical controls
SP 800-204D1 / 11204D-CI-COMMIT

What it stops10 techniques · 3 risks

10 techniques countered, 8 of them common

Exploitation of Known Vulnerable ComponentVery Common
Leaked Secret AbuseVery Common
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In FilesT1552.001Very Common
Valid AccountsT1078Very Common
Compromise Software Dependencies and Development ToolsT1195.001Common
Data from Information Repositories: Code RepositoriesT1213.003Common
Malicious or Compromised OAuth IntegrationCommon
Unauthorized Commit InjectionCommon
SLSA threat C: Compromised source code management systemSLSA-C
SLSA threat D: Build from modified source or parametersSLSA-D

3 risks reduced

Leaked credential enables unauthorized accessCritical
Excessive standing privilege in engineering platformsHigh
Known vulnerability in a reachable dependency is exploitedHigh

Where it runs4 phases · 2 ways to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Code4
Build2
Operate1
Monitor1

How it is delivered

SaaSSource control app

What it unlocks5 activities · reaches level 5

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 5. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 1

Scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities and licensesLow effort
Scan repositories and history for secretsLow effort

Level 2

Team-based least-privilege RBAC and access reviewLow effort

Level 4

Two-party review with phishing-resistant MFA and source provenanceMedium effort

Level 5

Detect any change that bypassed the front doorMedium effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsOpen core or freemium · free tier

LicensingOpen core or freemium

Priced perfree tier plus paid tiers

BillingSubscription

Scales withFeature tier, users or usage beyond the free tier

Total cost

Start free; enterprise needs such as SSO, audit logs and policy often require the paid tier.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with

No supported language, standard, integration or named feature recorded.

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13