Vendor Governance

Now pick what to compare Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management against.

Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management clear

Open a name for its full profile

Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
Capabilities only
Bitsight · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
selected
OneTrust Third-Party Management
Capabilities only
OneTrust · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Panorays
Capabilities only
Panorays · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
SecurityScorecard
Capabilities only
SecurityScorecard · Freemium · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management
Capabilities only
ProcessUnity · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
UpGuard
Capabilities only
UpGuard · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Whistic
Capabilities only
Whistic · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
AppOmni
Capabilities only
AppOmni · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Black Duck Binary Analysis
Capabilities only
Black Duck Software · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Finite State Platform
Capabilities only
Finite State · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
NetRise Trace
Capabilities only
NetRise · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ReversingLabs Spectra Assure
Capabilities only
ReversingLabs · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →

In Vendor Governance

AppOmni

AppOmni · Vendor Governance

Close ×

CommercialCompany

AppOmni monitors SaaS platforms including GitHub for risky settings, over-privileged integrations and anomalous activity.

What it does3 capabilities · 1 at full coverage

1 of 3 at full coverage.

Continuous Compliance MonitoringPartialGRC · level 3 · 9 providers
Non-Human Identity Discovery & GovernancePartialSECRETS · level 3 · 10 providers
SaaS & CI/CD Integration GovernanceFullVENDOR · level 3 · 3 providers

What it proves13 controls across 6 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

CSF 2.06 / 106GV.OV-03 GV.SC-04 ID.AM-04 ID.IM-01 PR.AA-01 PR.AA-05
CI/CD Top 102 / 10CICD-SEC-2 CICD-SEC-8
CIS Controls2 / 18CIS 4 CIS 5
AICM1 / 18A&A
Agentic Top 101 / 10ASI03
SAMM 2.01 / 90G-PC-3-B

What it stops5 techniques · 3 risks

5 techniques countered, 4 of them common

Valid AccountsT1078Very Common
Malicious or Compromised OAuth IntegrationCommon
Trusted RelationshipT1199Common
Trusted Supplier CompromiseCommon
AI Agent Privilege AbuseEmerging

3 risks reduced

Compromise introduced through a software supplier or integrationCritical
Ungoverned non-human and AI agent identitiesHigh
Control failures and framework non-compliance go unnoticedMedium

Where it runs2 phases · 1 way to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Operate3
Monitor2

How it is delivered

SaaS

What it unlocks3 activities · reaches level 4

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 4. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 3

Govern SaaS and CI/CD integrationsMedium effort

Level 4

Continuous compliance with automated evidenceMedium effort
Govern non-human and AI agent identitiesMedium effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsPlatform enterprise agreement

LicensingPlatform enterprise agreement

Priced perannual contract

BillingSubscription

Scales withNegotiated scope (developers, assets, modules)

Total cost

Opaque list pricing; benchmark with peers and require clear overage terms.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with

No supported language, standard, integration or named feature recorded.

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13