Vendor Governance

Now pick what to compare ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management against.

ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management clear

Open a name for its full profile

Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
Capabilities only
Bitsight · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
OneTrust Third-Party Management
Capabilities only
OneTrust · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Panorays
Capabilities only
Panorays · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
SecurityScorecard
Capabilities only
SecurityScorecard · Freemium · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management
Capabilities only
ProcessUnity · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
selected
UpGuard
Capabilities only
UpGuard · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Whistic
Capabilities only
Whistic · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
AppOmni
Capabilities only
AppOmni · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Black Duck Binary Analysis
Capabilities only
Black Duck Software · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Finite State Platform
Capabilities only
Finite State · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
NetRise Trace
Capabilities only
NetRise · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ReversingLabs Spectra Assure
Capabilities only
ReversingLabs · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →

In Vendor Governance

Black Duck Binary Analysis

Black Duck Software · Vendor Governance

Close ×

CommercialCompany

Binary Analysis identifies open-source components and vulnerabilities in third-party and legacy software.

What it does2 capabilities · 2 at full coverage

2 of 2 at full coverage.

SBOM GenerationFullSBOM · level 2 · 28 providers
Commercial Software Binary Composition AnalysisFullVENDOR · level 4 · 6 providers

What it proves12 controls across 8 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

CSF 2.03 / 106GV.SC-07 ID.AM-02 ID.RA-09
S2C2F2 / 25INV-1 REB-3
SSDF 1.12 / 42PS.3.2 PW.4.4
CIS Controls1 / 18CIS 2
CRA1 / 41Annex I Part II (1)
SAMM 2.01 / 90I-SB-2-B
SP 800-204D1 / 11204D-CI-EVIDENCE
Scorecard1 / 20SBOM

What it stops2 techniques · 2 risks

2 techniques countered, 2 of them common

Compromise Software Supply ChainT1195.002Common
Trusted Supplier CompromiseCommon

2 risks reduced

Compromise introduced through a software supplier or integrationCritical
Cannot determine exposure to a compromised componentHigh

Where it runs3 phases · 2 ways to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Plan1
Build1
Operate1

How it is delivered

SaaSSelf-hosted

What it unlocks3 activities · reaches level 4

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 4. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 1

Generate SBOMs for critical releasesLow effort

Level 2

SBOM for every build in SPDX and CycloneDXLow effort

Level 4

Continuous vendor monitoring and binary analysisMedium effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsPlatform enterprise agreement

LicensingPlatform enterprise agreement

Priced perannual contract

BillingSubscription

Scales withNegotiated scope (developers, assets, modules)

Total cost

Opaque list pricing; benchmark with peers and require clear overage terms.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with

No supported language, standard, integration or named feature recorded.

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13