Vendor Governance

Now pick what to compare OneTrust Third-Party Management against.

OneTrust Third-Party Management clear

Open a name for its full profile

Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
Capabilities only
Bitsight · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
OneTrust Third-Party Management
Capabilities only
OneTrust · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
selected
Panorays
Capabilities only
Panorays · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
SecurityScorecard
Capabilities only
SecurityScorecard · Freemium · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management
Capabilities only
ProcessUnity · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
UpGuard
Capabilities only
UpGuard · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Whistic
Capabilities only
Whistic · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
AppOmni
Capabilities only
AppOmni · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Black Duck Binary Analysis
Capabilities only
Black Duck Software · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Finite State Platform
Capabilities only
Finite State · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
NetRise Trace
Capabilities only
NetRise · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ReversingLabs Spectra Assure
Capabilities only
ReversingLabs · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →

In Vendor Governance

OneTrust Third-Party Management

OneTrust · Vendor Governance

Close ×

CommercialCompany

OneTrust manages third-party risk from onboarding through offboarding with privacy and compliance integration.

What it does3 capabilities · 1 at full coverage

1 of 3 at full coverage.

Security SLA & Contract Requirement ManagementPartialVENDOR · level 2 · 2 providers
Third-Party Vendor Security Assessment★FullVENDOR · level 1 · 9 providers
Vendor Attestation & SBOM Requirement TrackingPartialVENDOR · level 3 · 3 providers

What it proves15 controls across 8 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

CSF 2.05 / 106GV.SC-04 GV.SC-05 GV.SC-06 GV.SC-10 ID.RA-10
SAMM 2.03 / 90D-SR-1-B D-SR-2-B D-SR-3-B
SSDF 1.12 / 42PO.1.3 PW.4.4
AI RMF1 / 19GOVERN 6
AICM1 / 18STA
CIS Controls1 / 18CIS 15
CRA1 / 41Annex II (7)
S2C2F1 / 25AUD-4

What it stops2 techniques · 1 risk

2 techniques countered, 2 of them common

Trusted RelationshipT1199Common
Trusted Supplier CompromiseCommon

1 risks reduced

Compromise introduced through a software supplier or integrationCritical

Where it runs2 phases · 1 way to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Plan3
Operate1

How it is delivered

SaaS

What it unlocks2 activities · reaches level 2

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 2. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 1

Inventory and assess critical suppliersMedium effort

Level 2

Contract for SBOMsLow effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsPlatform enterprise agreement

LicensingPlatform enterprise agreement

Priced perannual contract

BillingSubscription

Scales withNegotiated scope (developers, assets, modules)

Total cost

Opaque list pricing; benchmark with peers and require clear overage terms.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with

No supported language, standard, integration or named feature recorded.

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13