Vendor Governance

Now pick what to compare AppOmni against.

AppOmni clear

Open a name for its full profile

Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
Capabilities only
Bitsight · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
OneTrust Third-Party Management
Capabilities only
OneTrust · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Panorays
Capabilities only
Panorays · Commercial · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
SecurityScorecard
Capabilities only
SecurityScorecard · Freemium · 3 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management
Capabilities only
ProcessUnity · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
UpGuard
Capabilities only
UpGuard · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Whistic
Capabilities only
Whistic · Commercial · 2 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
AppOmni
Capabilities only
AppOmni · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
selected
Black Duck Binary Analysis
Capabilities only
Black Duck Software · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
Finite State Platform
Capabilities only
Finite State · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
NetRise Trace
Capabilities only
NetRise · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →
ReversingLabs Spectra Assure
Capabilities only
ReversingLabs · Commercial · 1 capabilities in this domain
Compare →

In Vendor Governance

ReversingLabs Spectra Assure

ReversingLabs · Vendor Governance

Close ×

CommercialCompany

Spectra Assure decomposes release artifacts and third-party software to detect behaviors and differences between versions — the kind of analysis that surfaces compromised builds like 3CX.

What it does5 capabilities · 3 at full coverage

3 of 5 at full coverage.

Binary-to-Source VerificationPartialBUILD · level 5 · 2 providers
Malicious Package DetectionFullDEPS · level 2 · 14 providers
SBOM GenerationFullSBOM · level 2 · 28 providers
Secrets Detection in CI Logs & ArtifactsPartialSECRETS · level 3 · 4 providers
Commercial Software Binary Composition AnalysisFullVENDOR · level 4 · 6 providers

What it proves25 controls across 12 frameworks

Satisfied through its capabilities, not claimed by the vendor.

S2C2F5 / 25AUD-1 ING-3 INV-1 REB-3 SCA-4
SSDF 1.14 / 42PS.1.1 PS.3.2 PW.4.1 PW.4.4
CI/CD Top 103 / 10CICD-SEC-10 CICD-SEC-3 CICD-SEC-6
CSF 2.03 / 106GV.SC-07 ID.AM-02 ID.RA-09
CIS Controls2 / 18CIS 10 CIS 2
SP 800-204D2 / 11204D-CI-DEPS 204D-CI-EVIDENCE
CRA1 / 41Annex I Part II (1)
LLM Top 101 / 10LLM03:2025
OWASP Top 101 / 10A03:2025
SAMM 2.01 / 90I-SB-2-B
SLSA 1.21 / 16Build L2 — Consumer validates provenance
Scorecard1 / 20SBOM

What it stops12 techniques · 4 risks

12 techniques countered, 7 of them common

Malicious Install-Time ScriptVery Common
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In FilesT1552.001Very Common
CI Runner Secret ExfiltrationCommon
Compromise Software Dependencies and Development ToolsT1195.001Common
Compromise Software Supply ChainT1195.002Common
Maintainer Account TakeoverCommon
Trusted Supplier CompromiseCommon
Self-Propagating Package WormEmerging
Long-Con Maintainer Social EngineeringRare
Protestware and Maintainer SabotageRare
SLSA threat D: Build from modified source or parametersSLSA-D
SLSA threat DEP: Dependency threat (A–H applied recursively)SLSA-DEP

4 risks reduced

Compromise introduced through a software supplier or integrationCritical
Malicious dependency executes in development or CICritical
Cannot determine exposure to a compromised componentHigh
Pipeline secrets exfiltrated from runners or logsHigh

Where it runs5 phases · 3 ways to deploy

Capabilities per lifecycle phase

Plan1
Code1
Build3
Release2
Operate1

How it is delivered

CLI toolSaaSSelf-hosted

What it unlocks6 activities · reaches level 5

Program activities its capabilities support, reaching level 5. Supporting an activity is not completing it.

Level 1

Generate SBOMs for critical releasesLow effort

Level 2

SBOM for every build in SPDX and CycloneDXLow effort

Level 3

Automated rotation and log and artifact scanningMedium effort
Block malicious packages with behavioral analysisMedium effort

Level 4

Continuous vendor monitoring and binary analysisMedium effort

Level 5

HermeticHigh effort

How it holds up

Not assessed yet: no strengths, limits or evaluation scores. 47 of 340 products carry an assessment and 29 are scored.

What it costsPlatform enterprise agreement

LicensingPlatform enterprise agreement

Priced perannual contract

BillingSubscription

Scales withNegotiated scope (developers, assets, modules)

Total cost

Opaque list pricing; benchmark with peers and require clear overage terms.

What it takes to run

No staffing, rollout time or operational commitment recorded.

What it works with

No supported language, standard, integration or named feature recorded.

What else to look at

No alternative, competitor or family sibling is modeled for it.

What backs this up

No measurement, incident or pipeline using it.

Gantry 7.1.0 · OFF.12 · OFF.13